Symptom Number and Reduced Pre-infection Training Predict Prolonged Return to Training after SARS-CoV-2 in Athletes: AWARE IV.

PURPOSE: To determine factors predictive of prolonged return to training (RTT) in athletes with recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Athletes not vaccinated against COVID-19 (n = 207) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (predominantly ancestral virus and beta-variant) completed an online survey detailing the following factors: demographics (age, sex), level of sport participation, type of sport, co-morbidity history and pre-infection training (training hours 7 days pre-infection), SARS-CoV-2 symptoms (26 in 3 categories; "nose and throat", "chest and neck", and "whole body") and days to RTT. Main outcomes were hazard ratios (HR; 95%CI) for athletes with vs. without a factor, explored in univariate and multiple models. HR < 1 was predictive of prolonged RTT (reduced % chance of RTT after symptom onset). Significance was p < 0.05. RESULTS: Age, level of sport participation, type of sport and history of co-morbidities were not predictors of prolonged RTT. Significant predictors of prolonged RTT (univariate model) were (HR;95%CI): female (0.6;0.4-0.9; p = 0.01), reduced training in the 7 days pre-infection (1.03;1.01-1.06; p = 0.003), presence of symptoms by anatomical region [any "chest and neck" (0.6; 0.4-0.8; p = 0.004) and any "whole body" (0.6; 0.4-0.9; p = 0.025)], and several specific symptoms. Multiple models show that the greater number of symptoms in each anatomical region (adjusted for training hours in the 7 days pre-infection) was associated with prolonged RTT (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced pre-infection training hours and the number of acute infection symptoms may predict prolonged RTT in athletes with recent SARS-CoV-2. These data can assist physicians as well as athletes/coaches in planning and guiding RTT. Future studies can explore whether these variables can be used to predict time to return to full performance and classify severity of other acute respiratory infection in athletes.

International Olympic Committee (IOC) consensus statement on acute respiratory illness in athletes part 1: acute respiratory infections.

Acute illnesses affecting the respiratory tract are common and form a significant component of the work of Sport and Exercise Medicine (SEM) clinicians. Acute respiratory illness (ARill) can broadly be classified as non-infective ARill and acute respiratory infections (ARinf). The aim of this consensus is to provide the SEM clinician with an overview and practical clinical approach to ARinf in athletes. The International Olympic Committee (IOC) Medical and Scientific Commission appointed an international consensus group to review ARill (non-infective ARill and ARinf) in athletes. Six subgroups of the IOC Consensus group were initially established to review the following key areas of ARill in athletes: (1) epidemiology/risk factors for ARill, (2) ARinf, (3) non-infective ARill including ARill due to environmental exposure, (4) acute asthma and related conditions, (5) effects of ARill on exercise/sports performance, medical complications/return-to-sport and (6) acute nasal/vocal cord dysfunction presenting as ARill. Several systematic and narrative reviews were conducted by IOC consensus subgroups, and these then formed the basis of sections in the consensus documents. Drafting and internal review of sections were allocated to 'core' members of the consensus group, and an advanced draft of the consensus document was discussed during a meeting of the main consensus core group in Lausanne, Switzerland on 11 to 12 October 2021. Final edits were completed after the meeting. This consensus document (part 1) focusses on ARinf, which accounts for the majority of ARill in athletes. The first section of this consensus proposes a set of definitions and classifications of ARinf in athletes to standardise future data collection and reporting. The remainder of the consensus paper examines a wide range of clinical considerations related to ARinf in athletes: epidemiology, risk factors, pathology/pathophysiology, clinical presentation and diagnosis, management, prevention, medical considerations, risks of infection during exercise, effects of infection on exercise/sports performance and return-to-sport guidelines.

The effects of acute respiratory illness on exercise and sports performance outcomes in athletes - A systematic review by a subgroup of the IOC consensus group on "Acute respiratory illness in the athlete".

Acute respiratory infections (ARinf) are common in athletes, but their effects on exercise and sports performance remain unclear. This systematic review aimed to determine the acute (short-term) and longer-term effects of ARinf, including SARS-CoV-2 infection, on exercise and sports performance outcomes in athletes. Data sources searched included PubMed, Web of Science and EBSCOhost, from January 1990 to 31 December 2021. Eligibility criteria included original research studies published in English, measuring exercise and/or sports performance outcomes in athletes/physically active/military aged 15-65 years with ARinf. Information regarding the study cohort, diagnostic criteria, illness classification and quantitative data on the effect on exercise/sports performance were extracted. Database searches identified 1707 studies. After full-text screening, 17 studies were included (n = 7793). Outcomes were acute or longer-term effects on exercise (cardiovascular or pulmonary responses), or sports performance (training modifications, change in standardised point scoring systems, running biomechanics, match performance or ability to start/finish an event). There was substantial methodological heterogeneity between studies. ARinf was associated with acute decrements in sports performance outcomes (four studies) and pulmonary function (three studies), but minimal effects on cardiorespiratory endurance (seven studies in mild ARinf). Longer-term detrimental effects of ARinf on sports performance (six studies) were divided. Training mileage, overall training load, standardised sports performance-dependent points and match play can be affected over time. Despite few studies, there is a trend towards impairment in acute and longer-term exercise and sports outcomes after ARinf in athletes. Future research should consider a uniform approach to explore relationships between ARinf and exercise/sports performance.PROSPERO (CRD42020159259) HighlightsCardiorespiratory endurance is largely unaffected by recent mild SARS-CoV-2 infection and upper ARinf (rhinovirus) infection, however more severe ARinf is associated with a negative impact on exercise and sports performance.An upper ARinf (rhinovirus) and SARS-CoV-2 infection caused marked reductions in pulmonary function tests (FEV1.0/FVC), with greater reductions observed in more severe ARinf. However, the results remained within normal ranges.Self-reported training ability and training capacity can be reduced during an upper ARinf, and an ARinf with fever could alter running kinematics.Training mileage and overall training load can be impaired over time post-ARinf. Analysis of initial studies indicates a trend for a reduction in standardised sports performance-dependent points in athletes with respiratory infection.

The incidence and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection in South African professional rugby players - AWARE II.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the incidence and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infections in South African professional rugby union players in different phases of return-to-competition during a pandemic. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Players reported their history of SARS-CoV-2 infection before/during a national competition, using an online questionnaire (physician verified). Three periods of return to training/competition after a nation-wide complete lockdown during a pandemic were studied: 1) non-contact training, 2) contact training, 3) competition. The total period was 184 days (20/07/2020-20/01/2021) including 45 matches. Outcomes were: 1) incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection (I: per 1000 player days; 95%CI) in each period (calculated using a Poisson distribution), 2) player symptoms, 3) median days to return-to-training following SARS-CoV-2 infection, 4) method of transmission, and 5) percentage matches cancelled due to SARS-CoV-2 infections. RESULTS: 185 players had 42 physician verified positive SARS-CoV-2 infections (I = 1.23; 95%CI: 0.86-1.61). Incidences during the three periods were: non-contact training = 0, contact training (I = 1.04; 0.36-1.71; mostly forwards), and competition (I = 1.54; 1.00-2.10). 83 % of the infected players were symptomatic and 52 % of the 42 positive players had systemic symptoms. Median return-to-training was 14 days. 22 (52 %) SARS-CoV-2 infections were rugby-related: 13 off-field (31 %), 9 on-field (21 %). 11 % of matches were cancelled due to SARS-CoV-2 infections. CONCLUSIONS: As contact in rugby was introduced back into the game following lockdowns there was an increasing incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. On-field rugby activities were responsible for 21 % of SARS-CoV-2 infections and 11 % of matches had to be cancelled, indicating the need for risk mitigation strategies.

Symptom cluster is associated with prolonged return-to-play in symptomatic athletes with acute respiratory illness (including COVID-19): a cross-sectional study-AWARE study I.

BACKGROUND: There are no data relating symptoms of an acute respiratory illness (ARI) in general, and COVID-19 specifically, to return to play (RTP). OBJECTIVE: To determine if ARI symptoms are associated with more prolonged RTP, and if days to RTP and symptoms (number, type, duration and severity) differ in athletes with COVID-19 versus athletes with other ARI. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. SETTING: Online survey. PARTICIPANTS: Athletes with confirmed/suspected COVID-19 (ARICOV) (n=45) and athletes with other ARI (ARIOTH) (n=39). METHODS: Participants recorded days to RTP and completed an online survey detailing ARI symptoms (number, type, severity and duration) in three categories: 'nose and throat', 'chest and neck' and 'whole body'. We report the association between symptoms and RTP (% chance over 40 days) and compare the days to RTP and symptoms (number, type, duration and severity) in ARICOV versus ARIOTH subgroups. RESULTS: The symptom cluster associated with more prolonged RTP (lower chance over 40 days; %) (univariate analysis) was 'excessive fatigue' (75%; p<0.0001), 'chills' (65%; p=0.004), 'fever' (64%; p=0.004), 'headache' (56%; p=0.006), 'altered/loss sense of smell' (51%; p=0.009), 'Chest pain/pressure' (48%; p=0.033), 'difficulty in breathing' (48%; p=0.022) and 'loss of appetite' (47%; p=0.022). 'Excessive fatigue' remained associated with prolonged RTP (p=0.0002) in a multiple model. Compared with ARIOTH, the ARICOV subgroup had more severe disease (greater number, more severe symptoms) and more days to RTP (p=0.0043). CONCLUSION: Symptom clusters may be used by sport and exercise physicians to assist decision making for RTP in athletes with ARI (including COVID-19).